'You Have Blood on Your Hands When You Eat Vegetarian' Explained | CookingDistrict.com

'You Have Blood on Your Hands When You Eat Vegetarian' Explained

Recently, the online food community has been buzzing over comments made by Chef Dan Barber at the Beth-El Zedeck synagogue in Indianapolis. The headline is based off of this quote: "So to say that vegetarians live on this higher plane of ethics (and I’m not here to argue that slaughtering animals doesn’t carry with it some weight), but you have blood on your hands when you eat vegetarian as well, especially if you’re in the northeast." It's an interesting response to the question, "Why aren't you vegetarian?"

In the Room with Dan Barber from onBeing on Vimeo.

The full response explains how much New England-Dan Barber's home-is comprised of grasslands that lend themselves well to raising meat. In fact, he insists that meat is a very sustainable product produced directly off this local land. To stick to a strictly vegetarian diet would require shipping foodstuffs during winter months that require a huge carbon footprint. This in turn does harm other beings on earth, though the effect is obviously not as obvious as slaughtering an animal.

The response offers an interesting perspective on the age old vegetarian/carnivore debate. A transcript of this portion of the Q&A is posted below, as well as a video of the entire session. Check it out & let us knwo what you think.
Source: Grub Street and Vimeo
“Why aren’t you a vegetarian?”

'My wife is not a strict vegetarian, but she loves vegetables and would just be happy eating vegetables every meal we eat together, and I’m also fine with that. But why am I not standing up here and saying "eat less meat"? The answer is that I come from the lower Hudson Valley [New England] and my ecological conditions are dictating that we eat a lot of meat, because we’re grassland. What we grow best besides those carrots is an amazing diversity of healthful grass for animals. Now if you are in the game of feeding, say, a lamb, as I mentioned before, instead of on grain from Hoosier ecology but on the great grasslands (a diversity of grasslands from the New England landscape — the grasslands, by the way, that built New England, that built the dairy industry.

It’s no surprise this is the iconic landscape that I referenced with my grandmother — that wasn’t just about building beauty; that was about building what they were taking advantage of, which was cows grazing on great grass to produce great milk. That same ecology holds true today — those iconic open-pasture lands that I talk about produce the best-tasting meat in the world.

And so for me to be a vegetarian, and be a strict advocate of it, wouldn’t be listening to the ecology that the land is telling us it wants to grow. So I think one of the futures (dialing back to the young 11-year-old chef in the making) … one of the requirements of the chef for the future is not to propose a cuisine on the landscape, it’s going to have to be listening to the landscape to determine what kind of chef and what kind of eater we want to be. And if you are in southern Los Angeles and San Diego and you want to be a vegetarian, God bless you. You should be. You should be. But if you want to be in New England and you want to improve the ecological conditions of where you are, you’re eating meat. There’s no question about it. There is no healthy ecological system that I’ve ever seen that doesn’t include animals — there just doesn’t. Because the manure from the animals is a free, free ecological resource that amends the soil that gives you better-tasting and healthful vegetables. That’s been around since the beginning of time. So to say that vegetarians live on this higher plane of ethics (and I’m not here to argue that slaughtering animals doesn’t carry with it some weight), but you have blood on your hands when you eat vegetarian as well, especially if you’re in the northeast. Because your food is coming from somewhere, and your calories are coming from somewhere in the winter, and if they’re traveling hundreds of miles, and in many cases thousands of miles, you are burning fossil fuels to get them there, and generally they’re produced in monocultures, and that has a huge cost on natural living systems. They might not be animals that you and I can identify with, but they’re insects and bugs and whole types of flora and fauna that are dying to produce those vegetables. That’s not an ethical way to eat, I don’t think, in the future.'

Comments

jglas001 • 12/15/2010
Vegetarian is an old native American word for "bad hunter".
Sign In to post a comment.